BAIL REFORM UPDATE 2013: Pretrial Services Programs Refined and Expanded Their Reach, while the Bail Industry Continued to Fight Forfeiture Collection and Non-financial Release
In September 2012, JPI released a series of three research re
ports explaining the weakness of money bail and for-profit bail bonding in the criminal justice system. This brief provides an update on pretrial and bail reform during the last year and provides recommendations moving forward.
Overall, most jurisdictions continue to rely on money instead of scientifically measured public safety risk when it comes to pretrial release decisions. That practice, shown time and again to be ineffective, unfair and expensive, threatens public safety and puts money in the pockets of the for-profit bail bonding industry.
There has been some, mostly positive, movement in the areas of legislative activity, forfeiture collection, pretrial services expansion and bail bonding regulation since JPI launched its bail series in the fall of 2012.
Bail update factsheet
Read our 2012 Bail Report Series
Bail Fail: Why the U.S. Should End the Practice of Using Money for BailClick here for Bail Fail fact sheet
For Better or For Profit: How the Bail Bonding Industry Stands in the Way of Fair and Effective Pre-trial Justice Click here for For Better or For Profit fact sheet
Bailing on Baltimore: Voices from the Front Lines of the justice System
Note: In our 2012 report, Bailing on Baltimore: Voices from the Front Lines of the Justice System, we erroneously reported that release on recognizance “rarely” occurs in Baltimore City. According to data from the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services’ Central Region Statistics Report February 2013, of the 54,176 bookings processed in 2012, 43 percent were released on own recognizance, 4 percent were released without charge, and 52 percent were released to confinement in the detention center.
Posted in Criminal Justice (Adult), Fiscal Policy, Positive Social Investments, Racial Disparities